Introducing LGTY
Review the change, not just the diff.
LGTY reconstructs what a pull request actually does, affects, and intends — grounded in your code and its production reality — so your attention goes to judgment.
Less archaeology, more judgment.
A diff shows what text changed. The hard part of review is reconstructing what the change means, who depends on it, and whether the rendered behavior still matches the intent.
Change Analysis leads with call-graph and file-line receipts, then marks model interpretation as judgment. Production Impact joins the change to a pre-built index of read-only production metadata, including downstream consumers, traffic, and migration facts. Visual Review renders the same state before and after through the preview infrastructure a team already runs.
Each capability declares its reach. Stale or missing production coverage stays visible. A state that Visual Review cannot reach is shown as LGTY’s gap. The brief informs the reviewer; it does not approve a pull request or block a merge.
Production Impact
Production context before the postmortem
Designed to surface what an incident report would show — at review time, not in the postmortem: downstream consumers by production traffic, migration lock risk, and who is still on the old behavior, each claim carrying its own coverage declaration.
Production Impact brings pager-load and key-person-risk questions into the review conversation without turning LGTY into another generic review bot. It reads scoped metadata from connected systems and looks up a pre-built index instead of querying production for each pull request.